![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
test |
|||
![]() |
|
Knowledge ManagementKnowledge Management within the organisations In this economy where the only certainty is the uncertainty, the main safe resource for the competitive advantage that might last is KNOWLEDGE [Nonaka & Takeuchi, Professors at Tokyo, Stanford and Berkley Universities]. Among the experts who have developed studies about how to increase effectiveness of the Knowledge Management Process within the organisations, Professor at Berkley University Ikujiro Nonaka stands out as a forerunner of a wide range of Japanese authors who have worked about this topic as Kazuo Inumaru and Yogesh Malhotra. From Professor Malhotra.himself we should obtain a first remark that underlines the obvious link between technology and human capacity to obtain an effective management knowledge within an organisation: “ Knowledge Management solves the critical matters about adaptation, survival and knowledge among the organisation itself, facing environmental change more and more discontinuous. To sum up it is related to those organisational processes that combine the capacity to mix up information and process the information , with the creativity and the capacity to innovate that is typical of human beings. Kazuo Inumaru then suggest the following definition of KM and of its role within the value creation process and in the productivity increase in a company : Knowledge Management is called the methodology to literally manage the Knowledge. The aim consists with to increase the organisation competitiveness or increase through the process management more conscious and controlled. In a company where KM is well managed, the employees share their knowledge applied validated by the experience and the Know-How obtained during their work, contributing to increase the productivity and the competitiveness. Inumaru bases himself to the Knowledge Management model worked out by Ikujiro Nonaka and the fundamentals of this model are :
This distinction therefore, does not impede to both typologies, to interact among the company process development, so that “knowledge, following this progressive process, increases and matures from “individual” to “organisational”. From Professor Nonaka theory we should obtain four Knowledge Management typologies : • “Kaizen” : knowledge to increase effectiveness in the company management, sharing and using the “knowledge estate”; And four methodologies to its fulfilment within the organisation: • Best Practices Sharing; Effectiveness increase through sharing and transfer of knowledge, through learning caused by daily activities and the Know-How resulting from company internal success history; • Knowledge network dedicated : to link for examples in a global network people who own empowerment to decisions and dedicated knowledge inside and outside of the organisation, to solve problems or to undertake specific decisions. This combine allows to overcome the sum of the existing knowledge at individual level , collecting when necessary the knowledge in real time , using email and groupware. • Knowledge Capital : to make profit using internally and externally in respect to the organization the knowledge estate that should be transformed in economic value; patents, licences, author rights, trade marks should be considered knowledge estate of the organisation. • Sharing knowledge with Customers : Sharing knowledge with customers is fundamental as well as continuous knowledge offer to the habitual customer: Inside the organisational structure of the organisation, the Customers should be consciously involved. Another very interesting element presented by Nonaka is related to Top Management in a Knowledge Management Process , so that the most critical task from the leadership point of view is to conceptualize a vision about kind of Knowledge Management to be developed and to put into action within a management system.
|
Reserved area
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. All the project's contents reflect the views only
of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. |
![]() |
![]() |
||